Working draft for review. Built with Eleventy.

Services / Strategy and advisory

Advisory

Tree policy that can be applied in practice.

Some decisions sit above a single tree or a single site: how a Council assesses tree-removal applications, how an organisation manages a large tree population, what the policy says and whether anyone can actually apply it. We build that framework, from the position of a firm that writes the reports the policy governs.

Why it matters

Policy written by practitioners

A lot of tree policy is written from the outside, by people who never have to apply it. It reads well and falls apart in practice: criteria that cannot be assessed consistently, procedures that assume time or data nobody has, thresholds that do not match what is on the ground. The result is decisions that get challenged and overturned.

We come at it from the other end. We write the assessments, appear at VCAT, and see where a policy holds and where it breaks. A framework built from that knows what an officer can actually assess, what an applicant will contest, and what will withstand review.

Our principal has worked in and alongside Local Government for around two decades. The advice is grounded in how Councils actually run.

How it works

From gap analysis to a workable framework

Find where the current policy is failing, build a framework for the organisation's obligations, and make it something an officer can actually apply.

Where the policy is failing

Find the gap

A review of the current policy, procedure or strategy against what the Council or organisation actually has to decide, and against where decisions are being challenged or overturned.

The work

Build the framework

Tree policy, procedure and strategy written to the body's obligations and to AS 4970:2025 and the relevant standards, with criteria an officer can apply the same way every time.

So it can be applied

Make it usable

Criteria, thresholds and steps an officer can actually follow, and that can be relied on when a decision made under them is challenged. A framework that is used, not one that sits on a shelf.

Why our work can be relied on

Built by practitioners

A framework is only worth having if the officers using it can apply it, and it withstands a challenge.

Practical experience

We write the reports the policy governs and defend decisions at VCAT, so the framework knows what can actually be assessed and contested. See the record.

Built to be applied

Criteria that an officer can use consistently, not aspirations that fall apart on the first hard case during assessment.

Local Government experience

Around two decades working in and with Councils, so the advice fits how they actually operate, budgets, resourcing and all.

Reviewing your tree policy or strategy?

Tell us what you are working with and where it is falling short. We will set out how we would review it and what a workable framework looks like.

Discuss your needs